
HEALTH
CARE
POLICY STATEMENT
People with mental retardation and related developmental
disabilities must have dependable, high quality health care in the community and
affordable, comprehensive health insurance.
ISSUE
Too many of our constituents have faced numerous challenges, including
life-threatening barriers, in accessing timely and appropriate health care.
Problems in the community include inability to obtain appropriate quality
services, lack of access to specialists, and healthcare professionals who refuse
to serve or limit the options made available to this population.
Many communities in fact lack health professionals overall but especially
those trained to meet the needs of our constituents.
To add to the problem, health insurance coverage is frequently
unavailable or prohibitively expensive.
POSITION
Our constituents must
have universal access to appropriate, affordable, accessible, timely, and
comprehensive medical and dental treatment throughout their lives.
·
Disability must not be a
factor in the decision to provide, delay, or withhold treatments or to provide
or receive organ transplants. The
person’s medical condition and welfare must be the basis for the decision.
·
Reasonable accommodations
must be available for those who do not have the capacity to make health care
decisions.
·
Health Professionals must
receive specialized training to assure maximum health and to prevent secondary
conditions among our constituents. Furthermore,
the overall shortage of nurses and other trained professionals must be
addressed.
·
Reimbursement rates for
health care professionals must reflect the fact that many people with
disabilities have greater health care needs and thus require more time with a
health care provider. Reimbursement
rates must not provide a disincentive for healthcare professionals to provide
services.
Treatment must be high
quality and:
·
Based on a broad definition of medical necessity.
This must include not only overcoming or preventing illness but also
maintaining or preventing additional deterioration of existing functioning.
· Not denied on the basis of mental retardation.
· Given only with the informed consent of the individual or the surrogate
decision-maker and include the use of advance directives when applicable.
Health care reform must be based on the following
principles:
| Non-discriminatory: Prohibits denials for pre-existing conditions or mental retardation; prohibits practices which set higher premiums solely because of the existence of a disability; and provides timely access despite disability, age, race, location, income, health status, or change in address. |
| Comprehensive: Ensures a wide array of services including active and preventive medical care, mental health care, rehabilitation, personal assistance, and support. |
| Appropriate: Ensures services based on individual need, preference, and choice. |
| Equitable: Ensures that people with disabilities will not bear a disproportionate share of the costs. |
| Efficient: Maximizes
quality care and minimizes administrative costs. |
Other
considerations include:
Informed
consent.
The decision to accept or refuse treatment requires informed consent.
Informed consent requires that the individual decision-maker or surrogate
decision-maker:
·
Have the legal capacity
to give consent.
·
Be given enough
information to understand the benefits and risks of the proposed treatment.
·
Be offered the
opportunity to ask questions and receive answers understandable to that person.
·
Not be forced to accept a
particular treatment through deceit or threat.
Surrogate
Decision-making.
If an individual is unable to make his/her own medical decisions and does not
have an advance directive such as a "Living Will," or a health care
power of attorney, a surrogate decision-maker should be appointed to make these
decision before a crisis arises. People
who have such authority under state laws include the parent of a minor child,
the guardian/ conservator of an incapacitated adult, or surrogate
decision-makers designated under a health care consent law.
All decision-making by a surrogate decision-maker should be consistent with the
principles expressed in the sections above regarding Healthcare and informed
consent and must always be consistent with the best interests of the individual.
In addition, in decisions involving the refusal of medical treatments, or
nutrition and hydration when such refusal will result in the death of the
individual, the legal authority of the surrogate decision-maker should be
limited.
Specifically, that authority should be confined to
those situations in which the person's condition
is terminal, death is imminent, and any continuation or provision of treatment,
nutrition and/or hydration would only serve to prolong dying.
However, in such situations,
people with mental retardation must be provided aggressive medical treatment
to relieve pain, sustenance as medically indicated, and care designed to relieve
isolation, fear, and physical discomfort.
·
Advance
directives.
These are appropriate whenever informed consent is assured and should be
available and honored for individuals with mental retardation.
Informed
consent: voluntary, uncoerced agreement to accept a health care
treatment. (Midwest Bioethics
Center & University of Missouri-Kansas City, Institute for Human
Development, Bioethics Forum, Fall 1996)Surrogate decision-maker:
a person who makes health care decisions for a patient who cannot
make his or her own decisions. (Midwest Bioethics Center & University of Missouri-Kansas
City, Institute for Human Development, Bioethics Forum, Fall 1996)Advance Directive:
an individual's written or oral preferences regarding life-sustaining
medical treatment decisions. (Ethics
Manual, American College of Physicians, 1998)