CRIMINAL JUSTICE

 

POLICY STATEMENT

 People with mental retardation and related developmental disabilities, like other residents of the United States, have the right to justice and fair treatment in the criminal justice system, including reasonable accommodations as necessary.

 ISSUE

 Fear, prejudice, and lack of understanding of our constituents are magnified when an individual becomes involved in the criminal justice system.  Most attorneys, judges, law enforcement personnel, forensic evaluators, and citizens on juries lack adequate and appropriate knowledge  to apply standards of due process in a manner that provides justice for our constituents .

bulletVictims with these disabilities are frequently devalued and ignored.
bulletWitnesses are subject to routine exclusion because of stereotyped views of their competence to testify or denial of their needs for supports and accommodations.
bulletDefendants are often denied due process and effective representation at every stage of the proceedings.
bulletIncarcerated individuals are abused, exploited, and excluded from habilitative programs.

 When these individuals come into contact with the criminal justice system, they can find few organized resources for information, training, technical assistance, and referral.   Moreover, people with mental retardation involved with the criminal justice system encounter problems that are caused by their disability, such as:

·      Failing to have their disability identified by authorities because the individual is attempting to hide mental retardation.

·      Giving incriminating, but inaccurate “confessions,” because the individual wants to please or is confused or misled by inappropriately used investigative techniques.

·      Being found incompetent to stand trial because the individual cannot understand the criminal justice proceeding.

·      Being found incompetent and being inappropriately placed in an institution for a long period of time in order to “regain competency.”

·      Being unable to assist their lawyer in their own defense.

·     Waiving rights unknowingly in the face of required warnings such as Miranda.

·      Being victimized by the criminal justice system because their testimony is not deemed credible whether as a witness, victim or defendant. 

POSITION

 When our constituents come into contact with the criminal justice system, they must:

 

bulletHave their rights to access to justice and fair treatment assured.
bulletReceive assistance and accommodations to have their cases fairly heard.
bulletHave access to and the right to present expert evaluations and testimony by professionals with training and expertise in their disability
bulletBe treated fairly by all personnel including judges, defense lawyers, prosecutors, court personnel, forensic evaluators, law enforcement personnel, victim assistance personnel, and criminal justice policymakers.
bulletHave the right to an advocate, in addition to their lawyer, who has expertise in their  disability.
bulletBe protected from harm, self-incrimination, and exploitation at all stages of an investigation, including when they are questioned, detained, and incarcerated. 

 

When they act as witnesses, they must: 

·      Have available to them judges, lawyers, prosecutors, court personnel, and others who are educated about the effects of their disability. 

·      Have necessary supports and accommodations available so that their testimony is heard and fairly considered.  

When sentenced, they must: 

bulletHave available reasonable and appropriate accommodations, treatment, and education, as well as alternatives to sentencing and incarceration that include community-based corrections.
bulletBe exempt from the death penalty because existing case-by-case determinations of competence to stand trial, criminal responsibility, and mitigating factors at sentencing have proved insufficient to protect the rights of individuals with mental retardation.  The presence of mental retardation by definition raises so many possibilities of miscommunication, misinformation, and an inadequate defense that the imposition of the death penalty in unacceptable.  People with mental retardation must be exempt from the death penalty but not from other appropriate punishment, on a case-by-case basis.